What will the future of energy look like?

CSP

Back to the [Solar-powered] Future?

You are missing some Flash content that should appear here! Perhaps your browser cannot display it, or maybe it did not initialize correctly.

Every hour, the sun supplies to the surface of the Earth as much energy as humanity consumes in an entire year. Put another way, if we were to cover a single 100x100 square mile area in the desert with solar collectors they would generate more electricity than the United States currently consumes.  Is this the future of electricity? Or is it back to the future?

It was 1979 when President Jimmy Carter first set the goal of 20% solar by the year 2000. 30 years later and solar power accounts for less than 1% of the United States’ energy supply. So what happened to our green intentions? And whatever happened to those White House solar panels? To find out, join BTLS host David Biello as he uncovers the past, present and potential future of solar power.

Jeff Goodell on The Future of Electricity

You are missing some Flash content that should appear here! Perhaps your browser cannot display it, or maybe it did not initialize correctly.

Jeff Goodell, environmental author ('Big Coal', 'How to Cool the Planet') and contributing editor at Rolling Stone, shares his views on the future of electricity.

According to Jeff, in order to meet our growing energy needs we're going to need to stop thinking about generating 'clean' power vs. 'dirty', but instead start thinking in terms of how to develop 'smart' power vs. 'dumb'.

Goodell goes on to speculate that the current shift in how we think about the way we make and use electricity represents more than a technological transitionit's a cultural transition as well.

Subsidizing Solar: Too Much, Too Little or Too Late?

image courtesy of: http://push.pickensplan.comFor decades, the advance of distributed solar power in the United States has seen its share of setbacks. Distributed solar, as opposed to centralized (think big desert arrays like these), refers to solar photovoltaic panels—PV panels for short. In fact, just a few short years ago, headlines everywhere were warning investors of the impending burst of a 'solar bubble' caused by too much supply and not enough demand. While it's true that many solar start-ups have since fallen by the wayside, a new industry report by VLSI Research is seeing more than a light at the end of the tunnel—they're seeing the potential for a PV explosion.

According to weSRCH, who published the report, 2011 is slated to be a banner year for PV sales and investment. VLSI's market research states that PV sales are "expected to grow 24%, driving sales to in excess of $12B". Sounds like good news...and boy, did we need some good news. The recent financial crisis caused more than one hiccup for the growth of PV: in 2010, Spain (a global leader in solar installations) was forced to cut back their feed-in tariffs for solar. In the same year, the PACE financing scheme for solar installations in some U.S. states ran into some legal trouble of their own. According the VLSI, however, there’s a silver lining to be found here, too: "Looking back, 2010 was a record year for PV Manufacturing Equipment, beating the previous peak reached in 2008 by around 10%."

The report goes on to name companies like Applied Materials, Amtech, Apollo Solar, Komatsu, Jusung, GS Solar, and Meyer Burger as the big success stories of 2010. It also sites new manufacturing innovations as one reason for PV's surprising growth rate last year. What's interesting to note is that of the companies mentioned above, only Applied Materials and Amtech are based in the U.S. The others are from around the globe: South Korea, Switzerland, Japan, and of course, China. But this doesn't mean the U.S. doesn't stand to benefit greatly from 2011's 'sunny' forecast for solar sales—quite to the contrary...

It's Clean, It's Green, It's...Going Away?

wind turbine solar power alternative energy subsidies expire green clean jobsSubsidies for renewable energy may be going away...again.

America's stormy love affair with renewable energy began in the 1970's, when President Jimmy Carter introduced subsidies for what were then termed 'alternative' energy resources. But the burgeoning wind and solar industries that grew under Carter were not fated to last long. Nurturing an infant renewable energy industry was not part of Ronald Reagan's presidential image, nor his platform. Beyond the Light Switch looks at this pivotal time in our nation's history as a means to understand the current state of our energy policy and energy politics.

Currently, the hopes of many long-suffering renewable energy supporters (and industry players) have been pinned on the Obama administration. And Obama did make good--by ushering in subsidies for renewables, known as the "1603 grants" (so-called for the section of the stimulus bill that created them). And just in case you were wondering what those grants actually do, today The LA Times was kind enough to lay it out for us--the 1603 grants "paid up to 30% of the cost of projects breaking ground by the end of this year. Renewable facilities generating a combined 4,250 megawatts (the equivalent of roughly four large nuclear plants) were supported by the program as of March, according to a report by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory; that output is doubtless far higher now. The grants have created thousands of jobs, and helped clean the air and wean the country off fossil fuels. But all that may be about to stop".

Sounds scary, doesn't it? Well, what's happening is...

Syndicate content